A-1-CA-36774•August 15, 2019- Thomas Schroeder v. Richard Hill, No. A-1-CA-36774
Full text
Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM
Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 THOMAS SCHROEDER,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36774
5 RICHARD HILL,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY
8 Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge
9 Vance, Chavez & Associates
10 Claud Eugene Vance
11 Albuquerque, NM
12 for Appellee
13 Richard Hill
14 Los Lunas, NM
15 Pro Se Appellant
16
17 HANISEE,Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 {l} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
20 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
21 {2} AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/15/2019 8:51 AM1 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
9 10 11 12} 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court’s discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Court of Appeals of New Mexico THOMAS SCHROEDER, Filed 8/15/2019 8:51 AM Plaintiff-Appellee, AU. ~fe4 Mark Reynolds V. NO. A-1-CA-36774 RICHARD HILL, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge Vance, Chavez & Associates Claud Eugene Vance Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Richard Hill Los Lunas, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge. 1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2} AFFIRMED. 1/3; ITISSO ORDERED. ~ 7 Wn 3 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 41 WE CONCUR: 5 Mogae 40) LY. 6|| MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judgy’)
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.