A-1-CA-38485•August 18, 2020- Andrew Stump v. Blayne Minick, No. A-1-CA-38485
Full text
Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication
with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly
in Odyssey.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
ANDREW STUMP, 2
Petitioner-Appellee, 3
v. No. A-1-CA-38485 4
BLAYNE MINICK, 5
Respondent-Appellant. 6
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 7
Mary W. Rosner, District Judge 8
Andrew Stump 9
Youngtown, AZ 10
Pro Se Appellee 11
Blayne Minick 12
Las Cruces, NM 13
Pro Se Appellant 14
MEMORANDUM OPINION 15
VARGAS, Judge. 16
{1} Respondent appeals the district court’s order awarding Petitioner primary 17
physical custody of Child. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm 18
the district court’s order on June 25, 2020. On July 20, 2020, Petitioner filed a 19
memorandum in support of this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. To this date, 20
Respondent has not filed a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s notice of 21
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/18/2020 10:56 AM2
proposed disposition, and the time for doing so has now run. Accordingly, we rely 1
on the reasoning set out in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition and we affirm. 2
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 3
_________________________________ 4
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge 5
WE CONCUR: 6
_________________________________ 7
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge 8
_________________________________ 9
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge 10Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.