Conley v. Davidson

CourtListener 3591688NmNov 18, 1929

Full text

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moves dismissal of this, appeal on the sole ground that the five days’ notice required by App. Proc. Rule V, § 1, was riot given. ■ He showed no prejudice, and the notice omitted is not jurisdictional. We have therefore overruled the motion, under App. Proc. Rule XIV, § 3.

It is so ordered.

PARKER and CATRON, JJ., did not participate.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.