State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel

OPINION OF THE COURT.

DAVIS, J. The material facts in this case are identical with those in Morrison v. Crisp, 27 N. M. 380, 202 Pac. 123, decided at the present term. The same defense of lack of consideration was pleaded to the note sued upon, and the same law applies. That decision governs this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is so ordered.

RAYNOLDS, C. J., and PARKER, J.,-concur.