State v. Villalobos

This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in
the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the
citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-
generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Filing Date: June 24, 2019

NO. S-1-SC-37103

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellant and
Cross-Appellee,

v.

BRANDON VILLALOBOS,

Defendant-Appellee and
Cross-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY
James Lawrence Sanchez, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant and Cross-Appellee

Jeffrey J. Buckels
Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee and Cross-Appellant

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

{1} WHEREAS, this matter having come before the Court upon the State’s appeal of
an order suppressing evidence pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-3(B)(2) (1972)
and;

{2} The Court having considered the briefs, engaged in oral argument, and being
otherwise fully informed on the issues and applicable law and;
{3} The Court finding that there is no reasonable likelihood that a decision or formal
opinion of the Court, under the instant facts, would materially advance the law of the
State and;

{4} The Court exercising its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(2) NMRA to dispose of
a case by order, decision, or memorandum opinion rather than formal opinion;

{5} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the district court to
suppress all of Defendant’s statements made after the Miranda warnings is AFFIRMED;

{6} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court need not address (1) the State’s
argument that the district court erred by suppressing all statements made after
Defendant was handcuffed on the additional ground that those statements were not
voluntary or (2) Defendant’s argument, made pursuant to Rule 12-201(C) NMRA, that
warnings should have been given earlier under NMSA 1978, Section 32A-2-14 (2009).

{7} IT IS SO ORDERED.

BARBARA J. VIGIL, Justice

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice

DISSENTING.

JUDITH K. NAKAMURA, Chief Justice