Ohio Board Advisory Opinion Op 87-044

Op 87-044Ohiobar

Full text

The Supreme Court of Ohio
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE
41 SOUTH HIGH STREET-SUITE 3370, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6105
(614) 644-5800 FAX: (614) 644-5804
OFFICE OF SECRETARY
OPINION 87-044
Issued: October 13, 1987
[Former CJC Opinion-provides advice under the former Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct which is superseded by the
Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, eff. 3/1/2009.]
[Not Current: subsequent rule amendments to Canon 7, Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct]
SYLLABUS: Judges may ethically express their opinion regarding economic and political issues
or measures intended to improve the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice.
OPINION: We have before us two separate but similar requests for advisory opinions relating to
judges endorsing or opposing issues in an upcoming election. The first request concerns a county
sales tax which would finance needed improvements to the county jail and courthouse. The second
request concerns the merit selection plan for the selection and retention of judges in Ohio.
It is our opinion that judges may ethically endorse or oppose economic or political issues or
measures, provided they are intended to improve the law, the legal system, or the administration of
justice. Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 7A(4). We believe that both of the aforementioned issues
involve attempts to improve the law and the administration of justice. Therefore, whether a judge
agrees or disagrees with a local county sales tax or the merit selection plan, he or she may ethically
make known his or her opinion regarding these issues.
In conclusion, it is our opinion, and you are so advised that, as a judge, you may ethically
express your opinion regarding a county sales tax to finance needed improvements to the county
jail and courthouse, the merit selection plan or any other issue pertaining to the improvement of the
law, the legal system and the administration of justice.
Op. 87-044 2
This is an informal, non-binding advisory opinion, based upon the facts as presented and
limited to questions arising under the Code of Judicial Conduct.
James W. Mason, Esq.
Secretary
Board of Commissioners
on Grievances and Discipline

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.