2004 OK JUD ETH 3•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
2004 OK JUD ETH 3Judicial Ethics Advisory PanelOct 27, 2004
Full text
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
2004 OK JUD ETH 3
Decided: 10/27/2004
Cite as: 2004 OK JUD ETH 3, __ __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
QUESTION:
¶0 May a judge charge a reasonable fee for performing a wedding after court hours outside of the courthouse?
¶1 ANSWER: No
¶2 DISCUSSION:
Canon 4 D. Financial Activities.
(1) A judge should not engage in financial dealings that:
(a) may reasonably be perceived to exploit the judge’s judicial position, or . . ."
¶3 Personal retention of payment for performing a marriage is an exploitation of judicial office for personal gain. But for the judge’s judicial status, the judge would not have the legal capacity to perform a legally binding marriage ceremony.
Filed: October 27, 2004
/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman
/s/ Robert D. Simms, Vice Chairman
/s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.