347 Or 317•Petitions for review, November 5, 2009
Full text
317 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (221 P3d 748) ALLOWED November 5, 2009 Coffey v. Board of Geologist Examiners (A134319)(S057511)(226 Or App 418) State v. Machuca, Thomas Gregory (A133362)(S057910)(231 Or App 232) MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSmONS CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS (221 P3d 748) WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED November 3, 2009 A-W Bennett Enterprises, Inc. v. Custom Trailerwerks, Inc. (S057323)(alternative writ of mandamus allowed June 4, 2009 (346 Or 259)). It appears from the rec- ord that relator is in default for failure to serve and file the opening brief. It further appears that on August 19, 2009, the parties were given notice that this petition for writ of mandamus would be dismissed pursuant to ORAP 1.20 unless good cause was shown within 14 days from that date why the petition for writ of mandamus should not be dismissed. As of this date the opening brief has not been filed, therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.