CourtListener 10153376•State v. Vinson Filyaw
Full text
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Vinson Wayne Filyaw, Appellant.
Appeal From Kershaw County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-075
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
1, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Katherine Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Vinson Filyaw appeals his 421-year
sentence, arguing it violates the constitutional prohibition against cruel and
unusual punishment. After a thorough review of the record, and counsel's brief,
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.