State v. Rodney Nash

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Rodney Nash, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Thomas Anthony Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-176

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed March 1,
2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Rodney Nash was convicted of murder and possession
of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. Nash appeals arguing the
trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of alibi and admitting
evidence without a proper foundation.  Nash also filed a pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Nash's appeal and grant counsel's motion
[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.