City of Columbia v. Bolton

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

City of
Columbia, Respondent,

v.

Luella Bolton, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Acting Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-065  

Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed February
8, 2012

AFFIRMED

Luella Bolton, pro se, of Hopkins.

Constance D. Holloway, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Luella Bolton appeals the order of the circuit court
affirming her appeal from the municipal court.  She argues the circuit court
erred in finding evidence supported her conviction for failing to have an
infant in a child passenger restraint seat.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: City of Rock
Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) ("In
criminal appeals from municipal court, the circuit court does not conduct a de
novo review. . . .  [An] appellate court reviews errors of law
only." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.