Kelly v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Camilla Kelly, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

 Barry W. Knobel, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-122

Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed March
5, 2009

AFFIRMED

Clarissa Warren Joyner, of Orangeburg, for Appellant.

Susan Anderson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Camilla Kelly appeals the family court's dismissal of her appeal of an adverse
administrative order.  Kelly argues the family court erred by dismissing her
appeal because the administrative order violates her due process rights.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR,
and the following authority:  Anderson v. Short,
323 S.C. 522, 525, 476 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1996) (holding where the ruling of the
trial court is based on more than one ground, the appellate court will affirm
unless appellant appeals all grounds).

AFFIRMED.[1]

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.