VAZQUEZ-BAUTISTA, EX PARTE JUAN ESTEBAN v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10302943TexcrimappDec 11, 2024

Full text

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0072-24, PD-0080-24, PD-0121-24 & PD-0127-24

EX PARTE ELLIOT JERZAIN RAMOS-ESTRADA, JUAN ESTEBAN
VAZQUEZ-BAUTISTA, ABRAHAM VASQUEZ-MARQUEZ & JOSE ANTONIO-
SANTIAGO, Appellants

ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE SAN ANTONIO COURT OF APPEALS
WEBB COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., dissented.

OPINION

In each of these cases, Appellant was arrested for trespassing on private property.

See TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.05(a). He filed a pretrial application for a writ of habeas

corpus, arguing that the State was selectively prosecuting him in violation of his equal

protection rights. In each case, the trial court denied relief, Appellant appealed, and the
court of appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling denying relief.1

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review in each case, challenging the

court of appeals’ holding that Appellant’s claim is cognizable in a pretrial habeas

application. The State also argues that in each case the court of appeals erred by ordering

Appellant’s discharge rather than remanding the case for further development of the

record. We recently handed down our opinion in Ex parte Aparicio, No. PD-0461-23, ___

S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. October 9, 2024), in which we held that Aparicio’s

selective prosecution claim was cognizable in a pretrial habeas application. We also held

that Aparicio did not make a prima facie showing that he was arrested and prosecuted

because of his gender.

Consistent with our opinion in Aparicio, we grant review on our own motion of the

following ground in each case:

Did Appellant make a prima facie showing that he was arrested and prosecuted
because of his gender?

Accordingly, in each case, we vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the

case to that court in light of our opinion in Aparicio. The State’s petitions are refused. No

motions for rehearing will be entertained, and the Clerk is instructed to immediately issue

mandate.

1
Ex parte Ramos-Estrada, No. 04-22-00632-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio December 13,
2023); Ex parte Vazquez-Bautista, 683 S.W.3d 504 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2023); Ex parte
Vasquez-Marquez, No. 04-22-00626-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio December 27, 2023); Ex
parte Antonio-Santiago, No. 04-22-00628-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio December 27, 2023).
DATE DELIVERED: DECEMBER 11, 2024
DO NOT PUBLISH

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.