CourtListener 10779387•In Re NC and MI, LLC v. the State of Texas
Full text
Opinion issued January 22, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00055-CV
———————————
IN RE NC & MI LLC, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, NC & MI LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that
the trial court abused its discretion by granting the motion for sanctions filed by real
party in interest, EGR Construction Inc., and further by striking relator’s trial
exhibits and trial witnesses.1 Relator requested that this Court “find that [the trial
1
The underlying case is NC & MI LLC v. EGR Construction Inc., Cause No.
2024-09635, in the 215th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable
Nathan J. Milliron presiding.
court] should not have granted [r]eal [p]arty in [i]nterest’s Motion for Sanctions and
also, to consider [s]triking and [e]xcluding [r]elator’s [t]rial [e]xhibits and [t]rial
[w]itnesses, and that [the trial court’s] actions in [its] handling of this case
constitute[d] a clear abuse of discretion.”
We conclude that relator has failed to establish it is entitled to mandamus
relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We
dismiss any pending motion as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Dokupil.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.