Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez

CourtListener 10841807Txctapp1Mar 31, 2026

Full text

Opinion issued March 31, 2026

In The
Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00005-CV
———————————
ARTURO GOMEZ, Appellant
V.
ROSA CASAREZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 308th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2025-17524

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Arturo Gomez filed its notice of appeal on January 2, 2026.

Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of

appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207,

51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil
Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District

Litigation, and in the Business Court, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26,

2024), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that unless he paid the appellate filing fee

by February 23, 2026, his appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

To date, Appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s notice, paid the appellate filing

fee, or established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.

We thus dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.