CourtListener 10316213•Steve Wayne Baker v. the State of Texas
Full text
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-24-00377-CR
STEVE WAYNE BAKER,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 413th District Court
Johnson County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-F202300259
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 4, 2024, Steve Wayne Baker filed with the trial court clerk a pro se
“Motion for Out of Time Appeal” from the trial court’s judgment of conviction in this
case. That same day, the trial court clerk delivered a copy of Baker’s motion to this Court,
which we filed in this cause as a notice of appeal because the document showed Baker’s
desire to appeal from the trial court’s judgment of conviction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(c)(2).
Sentence was imposed in this case on October 20, 2023. Baker’s notice of appeal is
therefore untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See id. R. 26.2(a);
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where
notice of appeal is untimely). Furthermore, neither the trial court nor this Court has
authority to grant an out-of-time appeal. The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final
felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article
11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3;
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525 n.8.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Additionally, the request for an extension
of time to file the clerk’s record, filed on December 16, 2024, and Baker’s request for
appointment of appellate counsel, filed on December 27, 2024, are dismissed as moot.
MATT JOHNSON
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed January 16, 2025
Do not publish
[CRPM]
Baker v. State Page 2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.