In Re Earl Gray, County Attorney, Brazos County v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10372426Txctapp10Apr 3, 2025

Full text

Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas

10-25-00045-CR

In re Earl Gray, County Attorney, Brazos County

Original Proceeding

JUSTICE SMITH delivered the opinion of the Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Based on the record presented, we deny Relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. See In re State ex rel. Thompson, No. 10-22-00381-CR, 2022 WL

17671864, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 14, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.,

not designated for publication); In re Floyd, No. 05-16-00491-CV, 2016 WL

2353874, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 3, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)

(“The extraordinary nature of the mandamus remedy and the requirement that

a party seeking mandamus relief exercise diligence both mandate that

arguments not presented to the trial court cannot first be considered in an

original proceeding seeking mandamus”). This Court’s stay of proceedings in

the trial court granted on February 19, 2025 is lifted.
STEVE SMITH
Justice

OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: April 3, 2025
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Denied
Do not publish
OT06

In re Earl Gray, County Attorney, Brazos County Page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.