CourtListener 10662794•In Re Madyson Rae Hendricks v. the State of Texas
In Re Madyson Rae Hendricks v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10662794Txctapp10Aug 28, 2025
Full text
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00286-CR
10-25-00287-CR
10-25-00288-CR
In re Madyson Rae Hendricks
Original Proceeding
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denise Melendez filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on
behalf of Madyson Rae Hendricks, who is currently being held on three charges
for which bail has been set. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.13. The
applications were filed as original proceedings in this Court contending that
Madyson Rae Hendricks was being illegally confined and unlawfully
restrained in Walker County, Texas pursuant to three warrants.
Original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal
proceeding is limited to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district
courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05. In the
application, Melendez does not allege that she or Hendricks have filed petitions
for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court from which they are attempting to
appeal the trial court’s rulings. Because she is seeking direct relief from this
Court, we lack jurisdiction in this proceeding. See Ex parte Twyman, 716
S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).
The petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by Denise Melendez on
behalf of Madysen Rae Hendricks on August 26, 2025, are dismissed for want
of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
LEE HARRIS
Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: August 28, 2025
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Dismissed
Do not publish
OT06
In re Madyson Rae Hendricks Page 2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.