CourtListener 10662795•In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas
In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10662795Txctapp10Aug 28, 2025
Full text
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00289-CR
10-25-00290-CR
10-25-00291-CR
10-25-00292-CR
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman
Original Proceeding
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Crystal Wickman filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on
behalf of Jeremy Vance Wickman, who is currently incarcerated in Navarro
County in four cause numbers. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.13. The
applications were filed as original proceedings in this Court contending that
Jeremy Vance Wickman is being illegally confined and unlawfully restrained
in Navarro County, Texas.
Original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal
proceeding is limited to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district
courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05. In the
application, Crystal Wickman does not allege that she or Jeremy Wickman
have filed petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court from which
they are attempting to appeal. Because she is seeking direct relief from this
Court, we lack jurisdiction in this proceeding. See Ex parte Twyman, 716
S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).
The petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by Crystal Wickman on
behalf of Jeremy Vance Wickman on August 26, 2025, are dismissed for want
of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
MATT JOHNSON
Chief Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: August 28, 2025
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Dismissed
Do not publish
OT06
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman Page 2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.