CourtListener 10856007•Bradley Hunter Golden v. the State of Texas
Full text
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00392-CR
Bradley Hunter Golden,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
On appeal from the
19th District Court of McLennan County, Texas
Judge Thomas C. West, presiding
Trial Court Cause No. 2024-679-C1
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Bradley Hunter Golden was convicted of burglary of a vehicle, enhanced,
and sentenced to 15 years in prison. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Golden’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders
brief in support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the
appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's
brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance
with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has
performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. at
744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252
S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all
the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386
U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d
300 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any
basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108
S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this
appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v.
State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm
the trial court's judgment.
Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Golden is granted.
LEE HARRIS
Justice
Golden v. State Page 2
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: May 7, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Affirmed
Motion granted
Do Not Publish
CR25
Golden v. State Page 3
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.