CourtListener 9413457•Shakiel Shalayne Whitfield v. Scott De'Wayane Whitfield
Shakiel Shalayne Whitfield v. Scott De'Wayane Whitfield
CourtListener 9413457Txctapp10Jul 12, 2023
Full text
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-23-00165-CV
SHAKIEL SHALAYNE WHITFIELD,
Appellant
v.
SCOTT DE'WAYANE WHITFIELD,
Appellee
From the 13th District Court
Navarro County, Texas
Trial Court No. D22-30865-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The original filing fee for this appeal has not been paid.
By letter dated June 20, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the
filing fee was past due and that unless appellant obtained indigent status pursuant to
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, the
payment of the fee is required. In the same letter, the Clerk also warned appellant that if
the original filing fee was not paid within 14 days from the date of the letter, the appeal
would be dismissed. Fourteen days have passed and the fee has not been paid. 1
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson, and
Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Motion dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed July 12, 2023
[CV06]
1
Instead of receiving the filing fee, we received from appellant a motion for extension of time to file
appellant’s brief. The appellate record has not been filed and is not due to be filed until September 6, 2023;
thus, appellant’s brief is not yet due. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Further, nothing about the filing fee was
mentioned in the motion. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, filed on July 7,
2023, is dismissed.
Whitfield v. Whitfield Page 2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.