Hector De La Rosa v. Andrea Kay Brantley

CourtListener 9457516Txctapp10Jan 4, 2024

Full text

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00384-CV

HECTOR DE LA ROSA,
Appellant
v.

ANDREA KAY BRANTLEY,
Appellee

From the 18th District Court
Johnson County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-C202300007

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Hector De La Rosa attempts to appeal the trial court’s judgment rendered on

August 11, 2023. By letter dated December 1, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified De La

Rosa that the appeal was subject to dismissal because the notice of appeal was untimely.

In the same letter, the Clerk warned De La Rosa that the appeal would be dismissed

unless, within 10 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing that the

notice of appeal was timely filed. More than 10 days have passed and no response has

been filed.
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP.

P. 5; Tex. Gov't Code §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 51.941(a). Under these circumstances, we

suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.

R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way

eliminates or reduces the fees owed.

This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 44.3.

TOM GRAY
Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson, and
Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed January 4, 2024
[CV06]

De La Rosa v. Brantley Page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.