CourtListener 10385493•In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas
In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10385493Txctapp11Apr 24, 2025
Full text
11TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND, TEXAS
JUDGMENT
In re Christopher M. Perricone, * Original Mandamus Proceeding
No. 11-25-00078-CV * April 24, 2025
* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.
(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)
This court has considered Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of
mandamus and concludes that the petition should be dismissed in part for want of
jurisdiction and denied in part. We dismiss the portion of Christopher M.
Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to set aside the expired
temporary restraining order, and we deny the remainder of his petition. Therefore,
in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is
dismissed in part and denied in part.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.