CourtListener 10743801•SM Energy Company v. Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. and C&L Solutions, Inc.
SM Energy Company v. Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. and C&L Solutions, Inc.
CourtListener 10743801Txctapp11Nov 25, 2025
Full text
11TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND, TEXAS
JUDGMENT
SM Energy Company, * From the 118th District Court
of Howard County,
Trial Court No. 53991.
Vs. No. 11-23-00222-CV * November 25, 2025
Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. * Opinion by Trotter, J.
and C&L Solutions, Inc., (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is
error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,
we reverse the trial court’s judgment insofar as it awards damages to Buzzard Roost
Farms, Inc. and C&L Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $4,982,043.68 for the value
of the saltwater disposal wells, and we vacate that award and render judgment that
Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. and C&L Solutions, Inc. take-nothing on that claim.
Further, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and the award of attorneys’ fees to
Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. and C&L Solutions, Inc., and we remand the issue of
attorneys’ fees to the trial court for reconsideration and further proceedings
consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment of the
trial court. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against
SM Energy Company and 50% against Buzzard Roost Farms, Inc. and C&L
Solutions, Inc.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.