Robert Maynard Hodgson III v. the State of Texas

NO. 12-24-00183-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT MAYNARD HODGSON III, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH
APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

Robert Maynard Hodgson, III pleaded “guilty” to theft of cargo. In accordance with an
agreed punishment recommendation, the trial court sentenced Appellant to fifty years in prison.
Appellant appealed.
The clerk’s record has been filed and the trial court’s certification states that this is a plea
bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal, and that Appellant waived the right of
appeal. The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
The record also contains a written waiver of appeal signed by Appellant and his counsel. The
record does not otherwise indicate that the trial court gave Appellant permission to appeal.
When the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification
of the defendant’s right of appeal. Id. This Court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that
shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. Based on
our review of the record, the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a
plea bargain case, Appellant has no right to appeal, and Appellant waived the right of appeal.
See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals
should review record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). Because the
trial court did not grant Appellant the right to appeal, we dismiss the appeal.

Opinion delivered July 31, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

2
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 31, 2024

NO. 12-24-00183-CR

ROBERT MAYNARD HODGSON III,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court
of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-1537-22)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J