CourtListener 10737149•In Re Blanche Villarreal v. the State of Texas
In Re Blanche Villarreal v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10737149Txctapp13Nov 10, 2025
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00528-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE BLANCHE VILLARREAL
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and West
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña1
By petition for writ of mandamus, relator Blanche Villarreal seeks to compel the
trial court to vacate its October 6, 2025 order which, inter alia, dismissed the underlying
probate proceeding for lack of jurisdiction.
Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem.
Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836,
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”), id. R.
47.1 (“The court of appeals must hand down a written opinion that is as brief as practicable but that
addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal.”), id. R. 47.4 (explaining the
differences between opinions and memorandum opinions).
840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148
S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A writ of mandamus is available only
when the relator shows that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and the relator
lacks an adequate remedy on appeal. In re Ill. Nat’l Ins., 685 S.W.3d 826, 834 (Tex. 2024)
(orig. proceeding). “The relator bears the burden of proving these two requirements.” In
re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam);
see Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
The Court, having examined and fully considered relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus, the response filed by real party in interest Victor Flores, relator’s reply, and
the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met her burden to obtain relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
L. ARON PEÑA JR.
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
10th day of November, 2025.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.