CourtListener 10801992•Angel Ramos Hernandez and Bettzy Itzel Ramos Hernandez v. D&D Plaza, LLC
Angel Ramos Hernandez and Bettzy Itzel Ramos Hernandez v. D&D Plaza, LLC
CourtListener 10801992Txctapp13Feb 26, 2026
Full text
NUMBER 13-25-00686-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ANGEL RAMOS HERNANDEZ
AND BETTZY ITZEL RAMOS HERNANDEZ, Appellants,
v.
D&D PLAZA, LLC, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5
OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Cron, and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron
On December 29, 2025, appellants Angel Ramos Hernandez and Bettzy Itzel
Ramos Hernandez filed a notice of appeal regarding a final judgment signed on
November 12, 2025, in trial court cause number CL-25-3051-E in the County Court at
Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas. On December 30, 2025, the Clerk of the Court
requested appellants to pay the $205.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal within ten days.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying
costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required
by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order
that is just.”); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (delineating the required fees and costs in
an appellate court). On January 14, 2026, the Clerk notified appellants that they were
delinquent in submitting the filing fee for the appeal and informed them that the appeal
would be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the
notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). To date, appellants have failed to pay the filing fee
for the notice of appeal or otherwise respond to the Clerk’s notice.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the foregoing events, is of the
opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. Specifically, this Court has the authority to
dismiss an appeal because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the
appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521
S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellants have not paid
the appellate filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),
(c).
JENNY CRON
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
26th day of February, 2026.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.