CourtListener 10874649•Jane Doe v. Dr. Nelson Kalaf and Nelson R. Kalaf, MD P.A.
Jane Doe v. Dr. Nelson Kalaf and Nelson R. Kalaf, MD P.A.
CourtListener 10874649Txctapp13Jun 11, 2026
Full text
NUMBER 13-26-00234-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
JANE DOE, Appellant,
v.
DR. NELSON KALAF AND
NELSON R. KALAF, MD P.A., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2
OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices Silva and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On March 23, 2026, appellant
Jane Doe filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an order of dismissal entered in trial
court cause number CL-19-4487-B. On March 25, 2026, the Clerk of the Court notified
appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4). See TEX. R. APP. P. 5(e), 25.1(d)(4). Appellant
was further advised to remit a $205.00 filing fee within ten days from the date of the notice.
On April 9, 2026, the Clerk again notified appellant that she was delinquent in remitting a
$205.00 filing fee and that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not
paid within ten days from the date of the notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
Appellant has failed to cure the defective notice of appeal, failed to pay the filing
fee, and has otherwise not responded to the notices from the Clerk of the Court requiring
a response or other action within the time specified. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
for want of prosecution. See id.
JAIME TIJERINA
Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the
11th day of June, 2026.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.