CourtListener 10126535•Darnell Joseph v. Altman Specialty Plants, LLC
Darnell Joseph v. Altman Specialty Plants, LLC
CourtListener 10126535Txctapp14Sep 19, 2024
Full text
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 19, 2024
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00532-CV
DARNELL JOSEPH, Appellant
V.
ALTMAN SPECIALTY PLANTS, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 151st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2021-74539
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 22, 2024 indicating that appellant
was attempting to appeal a June 24, 2024 order denying appellant’s motion for
reconsideration. An order denying a motion for reconsideration or motion for new
trial is not independently appealable. See Digges v. Knowledge Alliance, Inc., 176
S.W.3d 463, 464 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). The final
appealable judgment in this case is the trial court’s order granting summary
judgment signed September 20, 2023. Appellant filed an untimely motion for
reconsideration on October 23, 2023, which was denied June 24, 2024. Appellant’s
notice of appeal was filed July 22, 2024.
The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is
signed when appellant has not filed a timely post-judgment motion. See Tex. R.
App. P. 26.1. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend
time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of
appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but
within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend
time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-
day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.
On August 27, 2024, this court transmitted notification to all parties that the
appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court
has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.