Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga

CourtListener 9501375Txctapp14May 9, 2024

Full text

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9, 2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00094-CV

JIMMY C. OLANIPEKUM, Appellant

V.
JESUS FERNANDO AGUINAGA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2020-77599

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed October 4, 2023.
Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration on November 3, 2023.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed February 6, 2024. When appellant has filed
a timely post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days
after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is
necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-
day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

On April 18, 2024, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was
subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response does not demonstrate that we have
jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.