Colin Eric Brown II v. the State of Texas

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________

No. 02-24-00286-CR
___________________________

COLIN ERIC BROWN II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 485th District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1620883

Before Kerr, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 2022, Colin Eric Brown II pleaded guilty to robbery, a second-degree felony,

and the trial court placed him on two years’ deferred-adjudication probation. See Tex.

Penal Code Ann. § 29.02. In March 2024, the State filed its amended petition to

adjudicate to allege five ways in which Brown had violated his deferred-adjudication

probation. Brown pleaded true to three of the State’s allegations. After hearing

evidence, the trial court found all five allegations true, adjudicated Brown guilty, and

assessed his sentence at four years’ confinement. See id. § 12.33. Brown appealed.

Brown’s court-appointed attorney, after determining that the appeal is frivolous,

filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a supporting brief. See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel’s motion and brief meet the

Anders requirements by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See id. at 744, 87 S. Ct.

at 1400. Additionally, complying with Kelly v. State, counsel provided Brown with copies

of the brief and motion to withdraw; informed him of his right to file a pro se response,

to review the record, and to seek discretionary review pro se should this court declare

his appeal frivolous; and counsel sent Brown a form motion for pro se access to the

appellate record. See 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim App. 2014). Brown had the

opportunity to file a pro se response to the Anders brief but did not do so. The State

declined to file a brief.

2
We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record and have determined

that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Nothing in the record supports

the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also

Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr
Elizabeth Kerr
Justice

Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: August 7, 2025

3