Josiah J. Gowan v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10813214Txctapp2Mar 19, 2026

Full text

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________

No. 02-26-00021-CR
___________________________

JOSIAH J. GOWAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 97th District Court
Montague County, Texas
Trial Court No. 25-169-DCCR-0142

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Josiah J. Gowan, acting pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial

court’s “Order on Bail.”1 But we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because a trial

court’s order on a pretrial motion to reduce bail is not appealable. See McKown v. State,

915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam) (holding

that a court of appeals generally only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a

criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction); see also Ragston v.

State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding that courts of appeals lack

jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals of pretrial orders regarding excessive bail or

denial of bail).

We notified Gowan of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over his appeal

and warned that we could dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless, within

ten days, he or any other party showed grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f), 44.3. More than ten days have passed, and we have not received a response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f);

Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 50–52.

1
The trial court’s order reduced Gowan’s bail from $50,000 to $45,000.

2
/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker
Justice

Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: March 19, 2026

3

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.