CourtListener 10707447•Yakob Alexander Loyd Hickman v. the State of Texas
Yakob Alexander Loyd Hickman v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10707447Txctapp3Oct 17, 2025
Full text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00049-CR
Yakob Alexander Loyd Hickman, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
NO. CR2022-331A, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found appellant Yakob Alexander Loyd Hickman guilty of murder, a
first-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. The trial court sentenced appellant to
life imprisonment.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of
the motion and brief to appellant, provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the appellate
record, and advised appellant of his rights to examine the appellate record, file a pro se brief, and
pursue discretionary review following the resolution of the appeal in this Court. See Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. To
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of
the proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders,
386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of
conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Maggie Ellis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis
Affirmed
Filed: October 17, 2025
Do Not Publish
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.