CourtListener 10691589•Servando Cervantes, Jr. v. the State of Texas
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00172-CR
Servando CERVANTES, JR.,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2024CR010311
Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 1, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
On March 14, 2025, appellant, Servando Cervantes, Jr., filed a notice of appeal. When the
clerk’s record was filed on April 14, 2025, it contained a trial court’s certification stating that this
“is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
The clerk’s record also contained the written plea bargain, established that the punishment assessed
by the trial court did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by
04-25-00172-CR
the defendant, and supported the trial court’s certification that the underlying case is a plea-bargain
case. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d).
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised
by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to
appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id. R. 25.2(a). We
must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
been made part of the record.” Id. R. 25.2(d).
On April 15, 2025, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d)
unless an amended trial court certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal was made
part of the appellate record by May 16, 2025. See id. R. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) and Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San
Antonio 2003, no pet.). On May 16, 2025, appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written
response, stating he has reviewed the record and concedes this cause must be dismissed because
this is a plea bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal. We therefore dismiss this
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.