CourtListener 10799377•Jayson Perryman v. Jung Williams
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00044-CV
Jayson PERRYMAN,
Appellant
v.
Jung WILLIAMS,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025-CV-10459
Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 18, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
This is an appeal in a forcible detainer case. Jurisdiction of forcible detainer actions is
expressly given to the justice court of the precinct where the property is located, and, on appeal,
to county courts for a trial de novo. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 27.031; TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.9; see
also Rice v. Pinney, 51 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). The record before this
court fails to show an appeal and a final judgment from the county court. See Benavides v. Deiter,
No. 04-25-00367-CV, 2025 WL 1911713, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 9, 2025, no pet.)
04-26-00044-CV
(mem. op.) (“The appropriate manner for Appellants to challenge the validity of the justice court’s
judgment is to appeal the judgment to the county court.”); TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.9.
Because we question our jurisdiction over this matter, we ordered appellant to show cause
no later than February 2, 2026, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
We cautioned appellant that this appeal would be dismissed if he failed to respond to our order.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
Appellant did not respond to our order, and the record does not show we have jurisdiction
over this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
-2-
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.