Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10842234Txctapp4Apr 8, 2026

Full text

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00160-CR

Bryan Keith GUTIERREZ,
Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,
Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas
Trial Court No. 25-09-00102-CRK
Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2026

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The clerk’s record reflects that on March 2, 2026, appellant filed a “Motion for Bond

Relief” in this court, appearing to challenge the amount set as bail and requesting that several

indictments against him be quashed. The record does not reflect a judgment of conviction. We

liberally construe appellant’s motion as a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2.

“Jurisdiction must be expressly given to the courts of appeals in a statute.” Ragston v. State,

424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “There is no constitutional or statutory authority
04-26-00160-CR

granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or

the denial of bail.” Id. And we have no jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order denying a

motion to quash an indictment. Ex parte Alvear, 524 S.W.3d 261, 263 (Tex. App.—Waco 2016,

no pet.).

We accordingly ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.