In Re Omar Elizondo, Ovidio Elizondo, and Dr. Anthony Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10845749Txctapp4Apr 15, 2026

Full text

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00236-CV

IN RE Omar ELIZONDO, Ovidio Elizondo, and Dr. Anthony Cynthia Elizondo Aradillas

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RELIEF DENIED AS MOOT; MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION
DENIED AS MOOT

Relators filed their petition for writ of mandamus, emergency motion for temporary relief,

and motion for expedited consideration on March 24, 2026. Having considered the petition and

motions, we have determined that relators have not established that they are entitled to the relief

requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The

emergency motion for temporary relief and the motion for expedited consideration are denied as

moot.

PER CURIAM

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12,620, styled Omar Elizondo v. Hilcorp Energy Company, pending in the
49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Walden Shelton presiding.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.