CourtListener 10012642•Cynthia Dukes and All Occupants v. Palladium Redbird Ltd.
Cynthia Dukes and All Occupants v. Palladium Redbird Ltd.
CourtListener 10012642Txctapp5Jul 16, 2024
Full text
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 16, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00167-CV
CYNTHIA DUKES AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant
V.
PALLADIUM REDBIRD LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-07830-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Reichek, Goldstein, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Garcia
Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to
our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without
a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by May 31, 2024. By postcard
dated June 3, 2024, we informed appellant her brief was overdue and directed
appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so
would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise corresponded
with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),
(c).
/Dennise Garcia/
DENNISE GARCIA
JUSTICE
240167F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CYNTHIA DUKES AND ALL On Appeal from the County Court at
OCCUPANTS, Appellant Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-07830-
No. 05-24-00167-CV V. B.
Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia.
PALLADIUM REDBIRD LTD., Justices Reichek and Goldstein
Appellee participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is
DISMISSED.
Judgment entered July 16, 2024
–3–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.