CourtListener 10046850•In Re: Joshua Skinner v. the State of Texas
Full text
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 16, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00951-CV
IN RE JOSHUA SKINNER, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 204th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F15-20176
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Smith
Before the Court is relator’s August 13, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus.
Relator asks this Court to compel Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to
deliver to relator notification of the trial court’s denial of relator’s motion for post-
conviction DNA testing and to notify this Court of relator’s notice of appeal from
the denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing.
Relator bears the burden to provide the Court with a record that is sufficient
to show his entitlement to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837
(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). To meet this burden, rule 52.3(k)(1)(A) requires the
relator to file an appendix with his petition that contains “a certified or sworn copy
of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained
of.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Rule 52.7(a)(1) requires the relator to file with
the petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the
relator’s claim for relief that was filed in any underlying proceeding.” TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.7(a)(1). Relator, however, did not file an appendix or record to support his
petition. Thus, relator failed to meet his burden to provide a sufficient record, and
his petition does not meet the requirements for consideration of mandamus relief.
See In re Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—
Dallas July 14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition.
Also before the Court is relator’s motion to file an original copy only of his
application for writ of mandamus. The motion is denied as moot.
/Craig Smith/
CRAIG SMITH
JUSTICE
240951F.P05
–2–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.