CourtListener 10103886•Gonzalo Bustos v. the State of Texas
Full text
AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed August 28, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-23-00651-CR
GONZALO BUSTOS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F22-56768-K
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Garcia
Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery but the jury found him guilty
of the lesser-included offense of robbery. The jury assessed punishment at twenty-
two years in prison and a $5000 fine.
In a single issue, appellant argues the Court should modify the judgment to
reflect the correct statute for the offense. The State agrees, and in a cross-point,
argues the judgment should also be modified to reflect the correct name of the
prosecutor.
We sustain appellant’s issue and the State’s cross-point and modify the
judgment as requested. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
We may modify a judgment to make the record speak the truth when we have
the information necessary to do so. See Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas
1991, pet. ref’d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b). The judgment reads “29.03 Penal
Code” under “Statute for Offense.” The record, however, shows the jury convicted
appellant of the lesser-included offense of robbery. We therefore modify the
judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted of robbery under TEX. PENAL CODE
ANN. § 29.02.
Further, the judgment currently states that Caitlin Paver represented the State.
But the record reflects that Marissa Hatchett prosecuted the trial. We modify the
judgment to reflect that Marissa Hatchett appeared as the attorney for the State.
As modified, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
/Dennise Garcia/
DENNISE GARCIA
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
230651F.U05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
GONZALO BUSTOS, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District
Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-23-00651-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F22-56768-K.
Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Pedersen, III and Smith
participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is
MODIFIED to reflect that appellant was convicted under TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.02
and Marissa Hatchett appeared as the attorney for the State.
As REFORMED, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered August 28, 2024
–3–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.