CourtListener 10295691•In Re: Jerald Mathew Cartee v. the State of Texas
In Re: Jerald Mathew Cartee v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10295691Txctapp5Dec 12, 2024
Full text
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 12, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-01439-CR
IN RE JERALD MATHEW CARTEE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 380-83836-2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Reichek, Goldstein, and Kennedy
Opinion by Justice Kennedy
Before the Court is relator Jerald Mathew Cartee’s petition for writ of
mandamus, filed December 9, 2024. Relator seeks an order compelling the Collin
County District Clerk to file relator’s motion styled “Defendant’s Motion for
Reproduction of Documents.”
The petition does not comply with the requirements of Rules of Appellate
Procedure 52.3 and 52.7. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. “Because relator has failed
to comply with the requirements of rule 52, he has failed to show he is entitled to
mandamus relief.” In re Mendez¸523 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2016,
orig. proceeding). Moreover, this Court cannot issue a writ of mandamus against
the Collin County District Clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Potts, 357 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex.
App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that
granting the petition is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
/Nancy E. Kennedy/
241439f.u05 NANCY KENNEDY
Do Not Publish JUSTICE
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
–2–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.