CourtListener 9498258•In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas
Full text
DENIED and Opinion Filed April 25, 2024
SIn The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00483-CV
IN RE MARK MILLIGAN, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-1127465
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
Before the Court is relator’s April 23, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus
challenging certain orders as void.
Upon review, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re
Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July
14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a) (requiring
complete list of parties and names and addresses of counsel), 52.3(b) (requiring table
of contents), 52.3(c) (requiring index of authorities), 52.3(f) (requiring issues or
points presented), 52.3(j) (requiring certification that relator has reviewed petition
and concluded every factual statement in petition is supported by competent
evidence included in the appendix or record), 52.7(a) (requiring sufficient record).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
240483F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III/
BILL PEDERSEN, III
JUSTICE
–2–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.