CourtListener 9508495•Herman Kenyatta Rabb v. Hilario Pasillas
Full text
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 21, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00030-CV
HERMAN KENYATTA RABB, Appellant
V.
HILARIO PASILLAS AND MYSTYLYN PASILLAS, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02366-C
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Kennedy
Opinion by Justice Molberg
Appellant appeals from the trial court’s December 18, 2023 summary
judgment. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal because it appeared the
notice of appeal was untimely. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney,
L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g)
(timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Under Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the notice of appeal was due no later than
January 17, 2024 or, with an extension motion, February 1, 2024. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 26.1 (providing thirty-day deadline for filing notice of appeal), 26.3 (providing
for fifteen-day extension of time to file notice of appeal). Appellant filed the
notice of appeal on January 18, 2024, within the extension period, but without an
extension motion. See id. 26.3.
Because appellant filed the notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace
period, we gave him an opportunity to file an extension motion. Although we
cautioned appellant that failure to comply within ten days could result in dismissal
of the appeal without further notice, more than ten days have passed and appellant
has not complied. Accordingly, on the record before us, we dismiss the appeal for
want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a); Brashear, 302 S.W.3d at 545.
/Ken Molberg/
KEN MOLBERG
240030F.P05 JUSTICE
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
HERMAN KENYATTA RABB, On Appeal from the County Court at
Appellant Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02366-
No. 05-24-00030-CV V. C.
Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg.
HILARIO PASILLAS AND Justices Nowell and Kennedy
MYSTYLYN PASILLAS, Appellees participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
Judgment entered May 21, 2024
–3–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.