CourtListener 10789746•Lee Anthony Haskin v. the State of Texas
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00001-CR
LEE ANTHONY HASKIN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 154th District Court
Lamb County, Texas
Trial Court No. DCR-5987-20, Honorable William C. Sowder, Visiting Judge Presiding
February 10, 2025
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Lee Anthony Haskin, appeals his conviction for evading arrest or
detention with a vehicle 1 and sentence to forty years of confinement. The trial court’s
certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case with no
right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2), (d). The record, however, does not contain a written plea agreement or waiver
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 38.04.
of appeal, nor does the judgment reflect that Appellant was convicted pursuant to a plea
bargain agreement.
Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the
cause to the trial court to prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal
consistent with the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610,
613-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial
court’s certification comports to the record). The trial court shall utilize reasonable means
to secure Appellant’s signature on the amended certification. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
The amended certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this
court by March 12, 2026.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.