Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC

CourtListener 10622189Txctapp8Jul 1, 2025

Full text

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

§ No. 08-24-00099-CV
GUILLERMO ACOSTA and
JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the
Appellants, § 261st District Court
v. § of Travis County, Texas
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and (TC# D-1-GN-24-001726)
RASIER, LLC, §

Appellees. §

SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT

The February 28, 2025 judgment of the Court is hereby withdrawn, and the following

judgment is issued in its place to correspond with date of issuance of the substituted opinion.

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appellants all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July 2025.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.