CourtListener 10035387•Alabaster, Inc. and John Sheffield v. Brent W. Coon and Brent W. Coon, PC D/B/A Brent Coon & Associates
Alabaster, Inc. and John Sheffield v. Brent W. Coon and Brent W. Coon, PC D/B/A Brent Coon & Associates
CourtListener 10035387Txctapp9Aug 8, 2024
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00134-CV
__________________
ALABASTER, INC. AND JOHN SHEFFIELD, Appellants
V.
BRENT W. COON AND BRENT W. COON, PC
D/B/A BRENT COON & ASSOCIATES, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 172nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. E199958
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 20, 2024, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial
court to give the trial court the opportunity to issue such further orders or judgments
necessary to clarify its April 6, 2023 Order or to create a final, appealable order in
this cause. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). The
Court order further stated: “Unless a final, appealable order or judgment is included
in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with the clerk of this court on or before
1
July 22, 2024, the appeal will be reinstated and dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”
To date, we have not received a supplemental clerk’s record. No party requested
additional time to obtain a final judgment or severance order.
The appeal is hereby reinstated. Generally, an appeal may be taken only from
final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. See
id. at 195. To be final, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case.
N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). As we
explained in our Order of June 20, 2024, the trial court’s Order of April 6, 2023,
which granted Coon’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants,
failed to dispose of the defendants’ counterclaims for attorney’s fees and sanctions.
The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on June 24, 2024
Opinion Delivered August 8, 2024
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.