CourtListener 10333024•In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas
In Re Raymond Reginald Peoples v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10333024Txctapp9Feb 12, 2025
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00027-CR
__________________
IN RE RAYMOND REGINALD PEOPLES
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. DCR23-0727
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Raymond Reginald Peoples complains
that the trial court has repeatedly refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus and failed
to order the trial court clerk to issue subpoenas for a hearing on Peoples’ pre-trial
application for a writ of habeas corpus.
In a criminal case, to establish a right to mandamus relief a relator must show
that no adequate remedy at law exists to redress the alleged harm and that he is
seeking to compel a ministerial act, one that does not involve a discretionary or
judicial decision. See In re State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of Appeals at
1
Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). The
relator must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought under unequivocal,
well-settled and clearly controlling principles. Id.
We have reviewed the mandamus petition and appendix. We conclude that
Peoples has failed to establish that he has a clear right to the relief he seeks. See id.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P.
52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on February 11, 2025
Opinion Delivered February 12, 2025
Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.