Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court

2007 UT 18UtahFeb 2, 2007

Full text

2007 UT 18
This opinion is subject to revision before final
publication in the Pacific Reporter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH
----oo0oo----
Kenneth W. Duncan; KWD No. 20051009
Associates, L.C.; Lee Duncan;
and Julee Associates, L.C.,
Petitioners,
v.
Fourth Judicial District Court;
The Honorable Fred. D. Howard;
The Honorable Gary D. Stott;
Brigham Young University; Tremco
Consultants, Inc.; Heber Valley
Bank; and SoftSolutions, Inc.,
Respondents.
_________________________________________________________________
Rannoch, L.L.C., and Carie, L.L.C., No. 20060203
Petitioners,
v.
Fourth Judicial District Court;
The Honorable James R. Taylor;
Brigham Young University; Tremco
Consultants, Inc.; Heber Valley F I L E D
Bank; and Softsolutions, Inc.,
Respondents. February 2, 2007
---
Original Proceedings in this Court
Attorneys: Clark R. Nielsen, Salt Lake City, for petitioners
Duncan, KWD Assoc., and Julee Assoc.
Michael R. Carlston, R. Brent Stephens, David L.
Pinkston, Salt Lake City, for petitioners Rannoch and
Carie
Brent M. Johnson, Salt Lake City, for respondents
Fourth District and Judges Howard, Stott, and Taylor
Steven W. Call, Michael D. Mayfield, Herschel J.
Saperstein, Benjamin J. Kotter, Salt Lake City, for
respondent BYU
No. 20051009, 20060203 2
Eric K. Schnibbe, Salt Lake City, for respondent
Tremco
---
NEHRING, Justice:
¶1 This opinion pertains to two petitions brought under
Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65B. We have consolidated the two
petitions because both parties ask for essentially the same
relief--the vacation of the July 10, 2002 supplemental order
entered in favor of Brigham Young University (BYU) and a
cessation of collection activities by BYU against petitioners.
In light of our holding in Brigham Young University v. Tremco
Consultants, Inc., 2007 UT 17, __ P.3d __, the petitions are
granted and the July 10, 2002 supplemental order is vacated.
---
¶2 Chief Justice Durham, Justice Parrish, and Judge
Atherton concur in Justice Nehring’s opinion.
¶3 Having disqualified themselves, Associate Chief Justice
Wilkins and Justice Durrant do not participate herein; Judge
Judith S.H. Atherton sat.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.