Colas, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Anthony Williams Riddick

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges McClanahan, Haley and Retired Judge Hodges∗
COLAS, INC. AND LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
MEMORANDUM OPINION∗∗
v. 	Record No. 2624-09-1 	PER CURIAM
APRIL 13, 2010
ANTHONY WILLIAMS RIDDICK
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Robert A. Rapaport; Bonnie P. Lane; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hull,
Brunick & Garriott, P.L.C., on brief), for appellants.
(Matthew H. Kraft; Matthew H. Kraft, P.L.C., on brief), for appellee.
Colas, Inc. and its insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, appeal a decision of the
Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that the evidence was sufficient to conclude
Anthony Riddick made reasonable efforts to market his residual work capacity. We have
reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See
Riddick v. Colas, Inc., VWC File No. 238-90-60 (Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
∗ Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant
to Code § 17.1-400(D).
∗∗ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.