Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Craig Theimer

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Alston, Chafin and Senior Judge Haley
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
AND INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
OF NORTH AMERICA
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1471-15-4 	PER CURIAM
JANUARY 26, 2016
CRAIG THEIMER
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(David A. Obuchowicz; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for
appellants.
(Robert A. Mordhorst; Locklin & Mordhorst, on brief), for appellee.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
(collectively employer) appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission
(Commission) awarding Craig Theimer (claimant) medical and temporary total disability
benefits for a lower back injury. On appeal, employer argues that the Commission erred when it
(1) attributed claimant’s back injury to a “twinge” claimant felt when claimant’s testimony and
the medical evidence related the injury to a “pop” felt by claimant when he twisted while
stepping off a ladder; and (2) found that claimant described a compensable accident when
claimant testified the injury occurred when he felt a “pop” in his lower back when he twisted
while stepping off a ladder and failed to identify any increased risk of his employment caused by
the ladder. We have reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its
UNPUBLISHED

- 2 -
opinion. See Theimer v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., JCN VA00001007729 (Aug. 18,
2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.